Sillybean

February 10, 2005

On hiring designers, FrontPage, and your 12-year-old nephew

[For those coming in from Ma.gnolia, it might be helpful to know, until I get my category tags fixed, that this is part of my web design for authors series.]

The choice between designing a site yourself or hiring someone to do it for you is a lot like the choice between negotiating your novel contract yourself or getting an agent. Having someone else do it is a big expense; no two ways about it. But just how much time are you willing to invest in learning the business of web design? It’s a profession like any other; what the pros do is obvious, but how they do it well involves a lot of training and experience. And this brings to my first big rant.

“My 12-year-old nephew has FrontPage and can make me a page just as well as a designer would.�

Oh, how this sets my teeth on edge. In terms of abject cluelessness it’s the web equivalent of “how much did it cost you to publish that bestseller?â€? Let’s clear this one up right now. I’ve already told you what I think of FrontPage (and I probably will again), so I’ll move right on to the wisdom of hiring relatives, especially kids, to design sites for you.

I don’t think you should have any of your relatives or close friends work on your site. Why? Let me go back to the agent analogy. The person you hire is going to be representing you on the web, in a way. You have to be able to toss around ideas without worrying that you’re going to ruin a relationship if you reject a color scheme. Your designer has to be free to tell you when you’re about to do something stupid, and you have to be able to tell your designer in no uncertain terms whether you like the work she’s doing.

The website is your opportunity to introduce yourself to your readers. Are you seriously going to leave it up to the kid who hates the tuna casserole you brought to Thanksgiving dinner? What if he does a bad job? Can you fire him without sending him to his room in tears and making a permanent enemy of your sister-in-law? Do you even want to risk it?

By all means, have your relatives check out your site when it’s done. Do they think it’s cool? Is everything clear? But don’t hire them to create it. If you’re going to pay someone at all, keep the relationship strictly professional. Otherwise, learn to do the site yourself.

I know of a number of authors whose sites are maintained by their relatives or spouses. Some of the sites suck. Some don’t; one of those linked is among the best author sites I’ve seen. It’s certainly not always true that having a relative do the site works out badly. But when it is true… well, now you have a crappy site and a pissed-off person stomping around your house. The crappy site alone is much easier to fix.

Comments

  1. I am only 13 years old but I would still like the oppritunity to do this.

    Posted by Tarquesia McGee on June 6th, 2005 at 9:14 am

  2. I agree with what you’ve said here, except for the 12-year-old part. Change that to, oh, 8-year-old and it’ll fit right in with my Web knowledge.

    Posted by Michael on August 13th, 2005 at 3:25 pm

  3. I made this page for my dad …. http://www.cfab.co.uk …. is it really that bad… we never fell out over it either!

    Posted by Rachael Skyner on April 19th, 2006 at 3:54 am

  4. To add to the comment above, left by my daughter Rachael, who is 14 years old… It’s a 40 page site, designed predominently in FrontPage (with a bit of manual HTML & Javascript), and I am over the moon with it. Most visitors to the site, who subsequently contact me, comment on how professional the site looks and how it must have cost a fortune, considering the fact that the going rate, for a 3-4 page static site, seems to be between £200 - £300. We actually worked very closely in getting the site exactly how I wanted it and it only ended up taking 4 half days to complete… I suppose it really is all down to having confidence in the ability of the person you use.

    Posted by John Skyner on May 8th, 2006 at 5:25 pm

  5. John and Rachael: I’m really glad it worked out for you and you’re happy with the results.

    The site does look fairly good. If you’re at all worried about attracting business from search engines, I would suggest a few changes. (And these are typical of all sites designed in FrontPage, which has a host of problems, and are not, I would say, a slight on Rachael’s skills.)

    First, I’d try replacing the menu rollovers with CSS-based menus to eliminate the massive amount of Javascript. Listamatic is a good example of this, and List-o-matic makes it fairly easy to accomplish.

    Second, I’d reconsider the use of frames. What search engines see when they visit your site is “Your browser does not support script If you can see this, your browser does not support iframes!” rather than your actual content.

    Third, I’d use real heading tags and style them with CSS rather than using font tags. This improves accessibility and allows search engines to figure out which phrases on your page are most important. (Font tags are deprecated — that is, they are not allowed in the latest versions of HTML.)

    Putting alt attributes on all the images would be a good idea, as well.

    In fact, doing just about everything mentioned on diveintoaccessibility.org would be an excellent idea, but I’ve called out all the ones that would help you most.

    Rachael, if you don’t want to learn HTML, the single best thing you could do for yourself is ditch FrontPage and look for an editor that will write standards-compliant HTML. Dreamweaver is probably the best, but it’s very expensive. I believe NVU is one of the best free editors.

    Posted by steph on May 8th, 2006 at 6:57 pm

Leave a Reply

-- or --

Textile formatting is in effect.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI

'round here

Writing & Publishing 101

Paged Media: Web Design for Authors

elsewhere

iPhoto ‘09 and Domain Language — Nice bit on how software (and web) interfaces are about language, and how Apple is changing the photo software field by moving past the standard photo album metaphor.

Comment on this

OH CANADA NO. (further discussion, supplemented by entertaining computer engineering metaphors, over at Making Light)

Comment on this

Thank You for Choosing the Hyatt Regency Purgatory “An automatic-teller machine is located in the lobby. For your convenience, it is attended at all hours and in perpetuity by the bank executive who came up with the idea of ATM fees.”

Comment on this

Twilight in Fifteen Minutes — Scathing and brilliant.

Comment on this

The Minority Report hand-waving computer interface is now real. Its users will have the best toned arms in the office.

Comment on this

The Matrix runs on Windows. Ow. It hurts to laugh that hard.

Comment on this

Google flu trends — doing something useful with all those searches for “flu symptoms.”

Comment on this

I’m addicted to the NYTimes maps this morning, especially the county bubble view. Hello, population distribution! It’s fascinating to compare this year to 2004.

Comment on this